A very interesting post over at that Helios blog about how his kids' Linux CD was confiscated in class and an email sent over to Ken from Helios Solutions about how free software can't be legal and how "putting linux on these machines is holding our kids back." Its an interesting read, however I don't agree with the anti-Microsoft tone in it.

Well, I do, but the way it was conveyed will probably shut the teacher off to what he is trying to say. Being supportive of both sides to the argument I know how hard it is to convert someone who is a huge Windows fan to even understanding some of the philosophy behind and benifits of Linux. Attacking the teachers belief in Windows and Microsoft in general won't help, neither will attacking her Union. It will most likely shut her off to understanding the reason behind the Linux movement and the advantages of using Linux over windows, especially on lower-end hardware and for lower-income families. Instead of attacking he should have given examples; Evertek Linux PC at Wal-mart, Asus Eee PC, XO Laptop and school boards that have or are starting to embrace Linux across the country.

This is my biggest gripe about most hard core linux supporters. You don't gain people to your cause by attacking them or their beleifs, you gain them by giving them compelling reasons and examples.